RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00037
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, be amended to reflect his Gulf War service.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He does not know why this information was left off of his DD
Form 214.
The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to
consider his application for possible additional benefits in the
future.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 26 May 87, he entered active duty.
On 25 May 91, he was released from active duty.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. The information provided by the
applicant and a review of his master personnel records did not
contain information that reflects he served in the Persian Gulf.
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 24 Mar 14, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was provided to
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).
As of this date, this office has not received a response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
failed to sustain his burden of proof that he has been the
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2014-00037 in Executive Session 9 Oct 14, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number
BC-2014-00037 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Dec 13, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 18 Feb 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Mar 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03091
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03091 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect that she served in the Persian Gulf. The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider her untimely application as a clerical error occurred. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01125
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01125 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Foreign Service in Saudi Arabia during Operation DESERT STORM. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01121
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the SWASM for his support of Operation VIGILANT WARRIOR and that time should be reflected as foreign service on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends the Board review the documentation provided by the applicant and determine if it is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02737
DPAPP notes a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence to substantiate any foreign service in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM. DPSIDR states there was no documentation located in the applicant military personnel records to reflect he served in support of Operation DESERT SHEILD/STORM. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 1 Oct 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00144
He served in Vietnam. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicants request for correction of his DD Form 214 to reflect he served in Korea. Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Mar 14, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01363
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01363 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his deployment to Incirlik Air Base, Turkey in support of Operation DESERT STORM. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02553
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicants request to reflect Foreign Service in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He participated in Operation SOUTHERN WATCH from approximately 6 Dec 97 through 27 Apr 98 for 127 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00520
_____________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there are no documents in the applicant’s military personnel record, nor has she provided any, to show she was on any flights to Turkey. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00893
He believes the Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he should get credit for his combat service. A review of his Master Personnel Records and submitted documentation failed to provide substantiation of foreign-service time in Afghanistan. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05435
Her DD Form 214 does not reflect any Foreign Service. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 14 Apr 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...